When reading this entry what first stood out to me was that Blake is addressing one of mankind's ongoing wonders, religion. I found it interesting that Blake compares man's perception of religion to a craving. A craving that can not be satisfied only by mere education but the craving is fueled by the senses.
"Man's perceptions are not bounded by organs of perception. He percieves more than
sense (tho' ever so acute) can discover reason or the ratio of all we have already
known is not the same that it shall be when we know more."
Blake makes a very good point for his argument of using the senses to help increase perception of religion. When it is percieved that you only have what you currently have proof or knowledge of then it is hard to think outside of the present. As Blake states when one has 3 senses and 3 elements it is hard to comprehend the thought of there being a fourth. Therefore, in order for man to have greater knowledge of religion man should not limit himself through perception. This way of thinking is not only used by Blake but I have also heard many sermons on the power of perception and having " faith the size of a mustard seed". Therefore there Blake may be right there is no natural religion because, its power and presence is manifested through the perception and craving of the individual.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Simone,
ReplyDeleteGood first post and interesting observations on a very challenging author. You are right that Blake states that our sensory perception is limited, and that more exists than man can perceive. I am bit confused why you say he compares man's perception of religion to a "craving," though. You use that term several times, but Blake does not, and the passage you quote to illustrate the point does not really do so, as far as I can tell. Be sure to demonstrate how the text supports your assertions in future posts.
The word "Craving" is a synonym of "Desire" The word "Desire" is used in the poem to describe the longing of man's vision past is natural perceptions. You by making this comment have proven to be controlled and limited to your physical senses and not your "Cravings" or "Desires" You might want to read her passage more carefully before making an assertion that she was wrong in her analogy.
ReplyDelete